Situs Judi Sbobet88 Asia Terbaik dan Terpercaya No 1

https://www.weather.gov/nwsexit.php?site=dmx&url=https://beachspy.xyz , as opposed to boosting healthy body toleration.50
36. Entire nudity is antithetic to the complex semi-porn of the fashion industry.
Julian Robinson observes, "modesty is so intertwined with sexual desire and also the need for sexual display--
fighting but at exactly the same time re kindling this desire--a self-perpetuating process is necessarily set in motion. In
fact modesty can never really achieve its ultimate end except through its disappearance. Concealing under the cloak of
modesty there are to be located many essential components of the sexual urge itself." 51
37. 52
At various times in Western history different parts of female human body have been eroticized: bellies and
thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and relatively diminutive waistlines and
bellies). Panties layout has historically emphasized these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized
the midriff and underscored the breasts--using stuff including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in
the mid 1800s highlighted the waistline; along with the bustle, appearing in 1868, emphasized the buttocks.53 Bathing suit
design today focuses attention on the breasts and pubic region.
"When primitive folks are unaccustomed to wearing clothing, putting it on for the
first time doesn't reduce their immorality, as the women of missionary societies think it'll. http://scripts.cac.psu.edu/staff/d/p/dpn3/cgi-bin/axs/ax.pl?https://nudismvideo.site has merely the
opposite effect. It brings attention to the body, particularly for those parts of it which are covered for the very first time." 54
Rob Boyte notes wryly that "textile individuals, when they do strip in front of others, generally do it for passion, and find
the bikini pattern tan-lines alluring. This really is reminiscent of the scarification practiced by primitive societies, and
shows how clothing patterns become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "In Case the conquest of sexual
desire were the first and last concern of life it would be more reasonable to prohibit clothing than to prohibit
nakedness." 56
38. The fashion industry depends on the sex appeal of clothing.
Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's fashions are essentially determined by the demand to keep
men's sexual attraction, and thus to transfer the principal zone of erotic display once a specified section of the body has
been saturated with attractive power to the stage of satiation. . . . Each new fashion seeks to arouse interest in a new
erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57
39. Differences of clothing between the genders focus attention on gender differences.58
Psychologist J.C. Flugel writes: "There seems to be (notably in modern life) no vital component in the
nature, habits, or functions of both genders that will necessitate a dramatic difference of costume--other than the
Want to accentuate sex differences themselves; an accentuation that chiefly serves the end of more easily and
frequently arousing sexual passion." 59
40. Many psychologists believe that clothing may originally have developed, in part, as a way of
Concentrating sexual attention.60
41. Partial clothing is more sexually stimulating (in commonly unhealthy ways) than full nudity.
Anne Hollander writes: "The more important clothing is, the more meaning attaches to its absence and the
more comprehension is generated about any relationship between both states." 61 Elizabeth B. H url ock notes that "it's
unquestionably a well known fact that recognizable things arouse no fascination, while concealment adds enchantment and
stimulates interest . . . a draped body with only enough covering to indicate the outline, is far more alluring than a
Completely nude body." 62 And Lee Baxandall finds, "the 'almost'-nude beaches, where bikinis and thongs are
paraded, are more sexually titillating than a clothing-optional resort or beach. What's natural is more fulfilling,
though it might not fit the tantalize-and-deliver titillation of our consumer culture." 63
42. Modesty--particularly enforced modesty--simply adds to sexual interest and want.64

Since they're publicly inaccessible; society further eroticizes the female breast by tagging it shameful to expose.
. . . This component of the forbidden just perpetuates the extreme male reaction female exposure supposedly
inspires." 65
43. Topfree66 inequality (requiring girls, but not men, to wear tops) produces an unhealthy fixation
with breasts as sexual objects.
44.
the encouragement of unneeded cosmetic surgery for breast augmentation, and avoidance of mandatory
breast examinations by girls.